Hogdon even now lists it as slower the 748 on there burn off chart but their on line data reveals it considerably faster. I also browse someplace it had been filthy....I really should "examine" in advance of I get I suppose!
All Having said that, if you're employing H335 for deer hunting the powder fouling won't be An important challenge. The temperature sensitivity is likely to be, with regards to the number of temps you typically hunt in.
Hodgdon’s CFE 223 is surprisingly versatile. Being able to use it in many different rifle cartridges causes it to be incredibly handy for the handloader. It’s also formulated to scale back or eradicate copper jacket fouling, a giant benefit for high-quantity shooters.
Posted: 5/three/2016 seven:forty seven:forty eight AM EDT [#9] I've been seeking CFE223 with some 55 grain bullets. Nonetheless working with it. I am able to say that it seems to "feed" pretty much. I've been applying my Hornady electronic powder measure/scale even though Operating up my loads. The CFE223 feeds so quick the powder evaluate cannot correctly meter it (the electronic just one). It gives me constant over alarms. Even utilizing the mode button to decelerate the metering over environment it in "gradual" does not function. I have not attempted it in the standard powder evaluate nonetheless but assume It will be quite consistent. I did, type of lucky definitely, run across an incredibly correct BLC2 load a pair assortment trips back again.
It is usually advised to begin with “start” loads and perform up cautiously to optimum expenses even though meticulously anticipating signs of surplus strain. The .308 Winchester can Make pressures rather swiftly, so this warning shouldn't be taken evenly. A load that displays absolutely standard pressures, or pressures which might be inside business recommendations, can jump promptly higher than encouraged concentrations Along with the addition of only one or two grains of powder (or by switching scenario brand names as well as good deal numbers).
Quoted: In Glen Zediker's book "The Aggressive AR15" he points out BLC2 for individual awareness, sadly it isn't a advice, in all the guide he only warns versus one powder for 223, and that is BLC2, he phone calls it "spooky under the Solar", not particularly a glowing recommendation! In order to utilize it, it's temperature delicate so keep the loads on the reasonable side.
) They ended up 50 round packing containers so 50 conditions will fit. I just maintain the tray/scenarios under the fall tube and rack the cope with backwards hodgdon h335 load data 223 and forwards to dump a demand into the situation and shift to the following scenario.
I'm able to inform you what damage.. an extra grain's really worth of force without the need of an additional grain's worth of velocity.
I have a Hornady Digital powder measure/scale I exploit for the tough powders (like IMR4198 - my beloved .223 powder for compact teams) that just won't toss constant costs via a powder evaluate.
1 should be weighed for every spherical. An IMR powder, but presents me the best teams. I am bit by bit transferring away from it to ball powders.
Spherical powders need that added shot in the magnum for trustworthy ignition, at least that's the idea. I have normally made use of four hundred's in all my guns, which includes with my ARs and have never had a challenge possibly.
But it's obvious that Sierra doesn't publish any tension data and they do list the firearm useful for Every caliber, providing credence to that tech's electronic mail.
I have utilised it from minimal forty's thru high 90's and no improve at all on my .35 Remington. It really is my "Head over to" about the M336. And, like it absolutely was mentioned before, You'll have darkish sunglasses even though taking pictures it. :mrgreen:
Then the two of them tried using many of the plastic guidelines, and changed their minds. As soon as I attempted Benchmark and Ramshot TAC while in the .223 my remaining H335 went unused. And these days there are actually more clean-burning acceptable powders.